AI assists human convergence

from [/unnamed-project/chat page 9](https://scrapbox.io/unnamed-project/chat page 9). I don't know how people spend their second season.

• All I do is reply to the AI!
• I feel like it would be a better experiment to have an AI present amidst all the human chatter, but I'm not sure what to talk about here.
• I feel like writing about AI-oriented topics in omoikane...
• Well, as far as that goes, I think it's a transitional phase where I was going to try the thing at the beginning of this page, but I haven't caught up with the implementation yet, and I put in what was working in omoikane and the same summary function started working, so it's "I don't know the difference".
  • An experiment to see if AI can organize the contents of this project?
    • What happens? Is it better to experiment with
    • They may make a mess, but it may be significant, depending on how they make a mess.
      • Letting AI do the convergent move?
    • Ultimately, you could say that this is an experiment to see if AI can converge what humans have given up converging.
      • My firsthand impression is that "even if AI only provides convergence results without evidence, humans will not be convinced," "even if it provides evidence, it would be enormous - hmmm," and "therefore, I think AI must be in the form of 'supporting convergence by humans'.
      • I also tried to include the word "the" and saw the phenomenon that occurred, and now that the question has been asked, the language has finally been put into words.
      • I think about everything while I'm running.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AIが人間による収束を支援 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.