Beyond the KJ Method
2022-12-13 NISHIO Hirokazu
Cybozu Labs Year-end Presentation
We recently held a KJ method study session at Loftwork.
- Held remotely via Zoom+Slack+Miro
- A little more than 40 people editing at the same time in a common place, interesting.

- I gave a 30-minute lecture with 1-hour lecture materials distributed in advance, which I will talk about in the next 4 minutes, for more information: KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork.
KJ method made by Jiro Kawakita [Jiro Kawakita.icon
- A lot has changed in 20 years.
- First semester 1967 "Idea method"
- Mid 1977 "Exploratory Studies of Knowledge"
- Late 1988 "KJ Method: Let Chaos Speak for Itself"
- The "idea method" is the most well-known, but it is the earliest and earliest concept.
- Applied to diverse purposes in the decade since the "Ideation Act."
- The concept of the term "KJ method" has been broadened.
- Points that received a strong response from participants
- Have you ever experienced an activity where a large group of people write things down on sticky notes and then a large group of people put them together?
- Many people recognize this as the "KJ method."
- However,
himself says, "If you do it alone first and your ability is not mature enough, undesirable compromises will occur.
What is an "undesirable compromise?"
- Let's say seniors and juniors are working in pairs.

- A senior said, "This is a circle."
- At this point, can the junior say, "From my point of view, it looks square?"
- (Is it round? I think it's square... but if senpai says it's round, is that right... I don't know what's right...) just so you know.
- This is the undesirable compromise.
- A cylinder is neither round nor square. A cylinder is neither round nor square.
Feedback from participants
I have a sense that what is being said in the areas of psychological safety and organizational diversity is being considered from a different perspective.
- That's exactly right!
Not cause undesirable compromises
- Team members need to talk about their "different ways of seeing"
- Need an environment where there is no hesitation in doing so.
- = Psychological safety environment
To improve the quality of "judgments", we should try to connect information from a number of different perspectives with consistency.
- Gathering "information from different perspectives" is easier when you have a diverse group of people with different points of view.
The Age of Pluralistic Organizations
- A pluralistic organization with many values axes
- The KJ method of thinking gives hints for a new form of teamwork.
- On the other hand, the specific methods of the KJ method are old
- Books from 1967 and 1988 only show how to do it before computers and smartphones became popular.
- What we did this time: Workshops with remote people in real time using Miro!
- That way is not written anywhere in
's book.
- What we need now
- While rediscovering the concept of the KJ method
- Update the KJ method with modern tools
- The subject of the update is
- It's not Jiro Kawakita.
- We who live in the present have to do it.
- How to do it.
- We should each create our own style and exchange information.
- because
- We live in an era of diverse work styles and values.
- It doesn't work for any one person to say, "This is the right way to do it.
- Each individual needs to find a way to fit in.
summary
- [Tradition is about preserving the fire, not worshipping the ashes.
- What we need now
- While rediscovering the concept of the KJ method
- Update the KJ method with modern tools
- Individuals will find the way that fits them best.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/KJ法の先にあるもの using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.