I've been using the ChatGPT version of Keichobot for a while now, so I haven't used the original version in a while.
summary
What would you like to see happen in this conversation?
I've been using the ChatGPT version of Keichobot for a while now, so it's been a while since I've used the original version.
What kind of "Keichobot" is that "Keichobot"?
Rule-based decision making without using ChatGPT
What kind of "ChatGPT" is that "ChatGPT"?
I'm using a huge language model with varied output, but I can't quite get them to follow the rules.
What is the "variation" of this "variation"?
Question variations. To begin with, Clean Language uses "20 questions" or "5 basic questions", so variations in question wording may not be so important
Is there anything else you can tell us about that "variation"?
The richness of variation may conversely be a disadvantage that makes it easier to make statements that deviate from the rules.
How do you know what the "variations" are?
It's in the Clean Language book.
What kind of "clean language" is this "clean language"?
Clarify the user's mental picture by asking hard-to-distort questions
The richness of variation may conversely be a disadvantage that makes it easier to make statements that deviate from the rules.
I thought it sounded like a chat statement, but I may have actually been mistaken. This doesn't sound like a conversation, but a "limited choice" like a hand of cards in a card game or a worker placement in a board game.
The richness of variation may conversely be a disadvantage that makes it easier to make statements that deviate from the rules.
It is important to be human scrutinized and limited
The richness of variation may conversely be a disadvantage that makes it easier to make statements that deviate from the rules.
🙁
It's in the Clean Language book.
One of the good things that the ChatGPT version explored by not being able to do clean language well was the ability to summarize, especially the key points in the Next Action, which seems to have produced a different and better effect than clean language.
What is it that you value?
At first I saw value in clean language, and I saw value in making it electronic and always available, so I created Keichobot; I saw value in ChatGPT's language capabilities, so I tried to port Keichobot, but currently I don't see much value in it; I see value in the ability to summarize, but I don't see much value in the ability to summarize. I feel the summary function is valuable.
What is the relationship between this "ChatGPT" and "Clean Language"?
Summary.
I created Keichobot because I initially saw value in clean language, and I saw value in making it available electronically at all times; I saw value in ChatGPT's language capabilities, so I tried to port Keichobot, but currently I don't see much value in it; I see value in the ability to summarize, but I don't see much value in the ability to summarize. I feel the summary function is valuable.
The relationship between ChatGPT and Clean Language, the two are incompatible. This is because Clean Language is like a cooperative board game, not a natural conversation.
Is that "ChatGPT" the same as "Clean Language"? Is it different?
It would be more beneficial to think of them as completely different.
ChatGPT and Clean Language, the two are incompatible. Because Clean Language is like a cooperative board game, not a natural conversation.
Clean Language as a board game is something I just came up with, so it's not anywhere in the world yet.
Where is this "clean language"?
I have a vague idea in my head, it would be good to clarify this and get it out of my head.
Clean Language as a board game is something I just came up with, so it's not anywhere in the world yet.
Maybe when Clean Language as a board game is playable, people will better understand how to use this Keichobot well!
What needs to happen to "clean language" for that to happen?
Clean language as a board game needs to be verbalized.
As for "clean language," can it be done?
I think it's a challenging assignment.
Clean language as a board game needs to be verbalized
We have to repeat the process of making small prototypes and test-playing them.
Clean language as a board game needs to be verbalized
https://keicho.netlify.app/#talk=XMZpJnByOa9qNk0vOBqU #KeichobotLog
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ボードゲームとしてのクリーンランゲージ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.