Consistency of decision criteria

• consistency of evaluation criteria One person said, "
• In the past, I decided that B should be preferred over A with evaluation criteria as X. Now, I have decided that B should be preferred over A with evaluation criteria as X.
• Now, if X is the criterion, then D should take precedence over C, but it seems to me that C should take precedence.
• But there is no consistency. I don't know if this is the right thing to do. I was struggling with the idea.

Good.

It was a mistake to verbalize "X is the criterion" in T1 during the previous decision-making process.

• They were unaware that there was another axis, Y.
• He finally realized this when he saw a case where the difference in X was not so great and the difference in Y was large.

It is important to realize the mistake.

• Mistakes should be corrected.

  • err and not change one's ways, this is what it is to err

• Mistakes in decision-making and Mistakes in the language of decision-making methods are two different things.

  • Rules of unknown value should be discarded.

• Mistakes in the language of methods

• Linguistic Mistakes

• decision-making

• Language of Methods Language of Methodology

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/判断基準の一貫性 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.