<ul>
<li><a href="/en/Axial%20transformation">Axial transformation</a>, <a href="/en/Axial%20leg">Axial leg</a> is <a href="/en/abstract">abstract</a>, which makes <a href="/en/Climbing%20down%20metaphor">Climbing down metaphor</a>.</li>
</ul>
<img src="https://gyazo.com/d0d9cd3cf7ed4f7d81a7dc11fd8e3950/thumb/1000" alt="image">
Specific examples C1 and C2 are different
 - When a <a href="/en/new%20thing">new thing</a> is created, the new thing is <a href="/en/different">different</a> from the <a href="/en/existing%20thing">existing thing</a>.
<ul>
<li>If it&#39;s not different, it&#39;s not a <a href="/en/creation">creation</a> of something new.<ul>
<li><a href="/en/The%20same%20is%20not%20new.">The same is not new.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
But if C2 is separate from C1, wouldn&#39;t C1 <a href="/en/experience">experience</a> be useless?
<ul>
<li>Actually not, specific experience in past actions can be beneficial in new and different actions.</li>
<li>So why does it happen?<ul>
<li><a href="/en/abstraction">abstraction</a> because the <a href="/en/model">model</a> A that was created by <a href="/en/abstraction">abstraction</a> is connected.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
This page is auto-translated from <a href="https://scrapbox.io/nishio/%E6%8A%BD%E8%B1%A1%E3%82%92%E8%BB%B8%E8%B6%B3%E3%81%AB%E3%81%97%E3%81%9F%E5%A4%89%E6%8F%9B">/nishio/抽象を軸足にした変換</a> using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at <a href="https://twitter.com/nishio_en">@nishio_en</a>. I&#39;m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.

Conversion with abstraction as the axial foot