(Notes for the next day)
TheirProblem to be solved がPCOとはそもそも違うんだろうなと感じた
The motive is "I want to own an expensive NFT, but I can't afford it, so I want to own it cheap."
Most of the expected users can't afford 6 million for immediate cash and don't have the risk tolerance to withstand the risk of not being able to sell in a year, do they? Then I had a feeling that a service like Gradual for NFT would occur for residential SALSA as well, and eventually the end user would be able to rent for 50,000 per month.
[/Yu-da1/ Increasing liquidity is not the same as optimal](https://scrapbox.io/Yu-da1/ Increasing liquidity is not the same as optimal).
I think you mentioned Partial Common ownership and the Radical market, but I felt uncomfortable.
The premise is that since I've been talking to Mr. Gusan and others and seeing their tweets, my objective is "toliquidity なの」を知っていたからなのかもだけど
I like the idea that after information is shared at the event, thoughts are distributed and asynchronously deepened in each person's Scrapbox, and then gently reassembled through links in the Scrapbox.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/GradualとPCO using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.