Impressions and improvements in doing Polis

from Diary 2023-06-09 Impressions and improvements in doing Polis Summary: Impressions from using Polis include a sense of attribution of agenda postings among users and limited data retrieval points, requiring consideration of mechanisms for more effective discussions.

Thoughts on doing Polis. - Questioning by OpenAI

• Those who add an agenda by name prefer that others' attention and votes increase for that agenda.
  • There are users who prefer to remain anonymous and [users who prefer to have their opinions attributed to them
• A system to post individual agendas to SNS like yuiseki was creating would be useful.
• There is an option to create the entire service or tweak the UI layer of Polis to make it happen.
  • When using Polis, it seems essential to set up your own instance instead of Pol.is
  • With pol.is instances, you can't take the data out and use it for something else.
  • Example of "Extract and Use Data": I want to copy the data of opinions posted on individual agendas to "Conversations about individual agendas" for the "Conversations about agendas" I'm working on, but I can't do it.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Polisやってての感想と改善 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.