In some cases, symbols that do not symbolize "one felt meaning" facilitate understanding (v1)

from Study Session 1 on "Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning In some cases, symbols that are not symbols of "one felt meaning" facilitate understanding - However, there are cases where symbols that are not symbolic of that "one felt meaning" promote understanding - So here's what I mean. - - SR does not symbolize Fx, but helps Fx symbolize into Sx - This is "RELEVANCE." - I thought that this "understanding" uses UNDERSTAND, which is different from the COMPREHENSION translation of "understanding"...

• Relevance is "that kind of related felt meaning whereby the symbolization is thereby made intelligible."

  • relevant felt meanings, from out of which symbolization is understandable

• Here's what they say in everyday conversation

  • To understand, we need "past experience".

  • " context" must be understood

  • This is different from COMPREHENSION.
    • What does UNDERSTAND mean here?

• A set of symbols comes to be understood with the help of many other experienced meanings, not just the one felt meaning they represent (p. 158).

  • This "understanding" is UNDERSTOOD

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「一つの感じられた意味」をシンボル化したものではないシンボルが理解を促すケースがある(v1) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.