Think of reason as "a box that produces an output based on an input.
Condition 1: Observed disagreement between you and the other party.
Condition 2: If you have faith that "the other person's reasoning is working correctly
The inference can be drawn that "there will be a difference in input."
"What are the inputs that brought about that output?" By digging deeper, you can get information that is not in your scope of observation.
Condition 1 is "able to express opinions that differ from those of others."
Condition 2 is "the other party's reason can be trusted."
It will be associated with Project Aristotle in the form of
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/対話によって学びを得る using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.