from [/villagepump/I need some good naming for "multiple links connected and wrapped pages"](https://scrapbox.io/villagepump/I need some good naming for "multiple links connected and wrapped pages").
I don't know what to call it.

- [/takker/wrap page with multiple links connected](https://scrapbox.io/takker/wrap page with multiple links connected).
- If anyone comes up with a good name or knows the name, please let me know.

- Is it easier to connect later if you separate them into keywords, or bet on

- This is the kind of guy I'm talking about.
- 
- is

- developmental process
- [/nishio/people with a lot of output should Scrapbox](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/people with a lot of output should Scrapbox).
- to "stop using the legacy protocol of conversation.
- I thought the combination of "conversation" and "legacy protocol" was interesting, so I made a link to "The Legacy Protocol of Conversation."
- I opened "The Legacy Protocol of Conversation" and thought about it for a minute, but couldn't think of anything in particular to write about.
- But if we leave it as is, [Future Connections](/en/Future%20Connections) is unlikely to occur (because the link string is long).
- [CD](/en/CD) is small
- So I wrote the title as it is and used it as a link for "shorter keywords".
- That's the objective.

- If I had found something to write about and did write it, I would have similarly made "conversation" and "legacy protocols" the links.
- Plus, you mention "legacy protocols" on the "Legacy Protocols" page.
- [/nishio/legacy-protocols](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/legacy-protocols).
- The "legacy format" is placed here by association, leading to "liberation from the legacy format of books".
- So, I'm thinking "[Long title engraving page](/en/Long%20title%20engraving%20page)" or something like that.
- Compared to "multiple links connected to a WRAP page," the timeline of the action is reversed.
- Create a page with multiple short keywords attached to it.
- Whether to distinguish time axis orientation

- I see
- > But if we leave it as is, future connections are unlikely to occur (because of the long string of links).
- > so I wrote the title as is and used the "shorter keywords" link.
- Is it easier to connect later if you separate them into keywords, or bet on

- [intersection table](/en/intersection%20table) like

- Oh, I'll make this one.
- It's a natural occurrence in the structure.
- Even when making a link with more than one word in a verse, there is a hesitation about where to chop it up.
- If you want to do it systematically, it is safer to make it longer first and then [WRAP page with multiple links connected](/en/WRAP%20page%20with%20multiple%20links%20connected).

- do often
- [Hashtags to link words that did not appear in the text
derivation
- When titles are shorter, links tend to be larger.
- Long titles and large links
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/長いタイトルを刻むページ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.