For algorithms that require repeated random accesses with subscripts, it is faster to keep the list than to use numpy.array. python
In [71]: %%timeit
...: xs = np.zeros(100)
...: xs[0]
...:
696 ns ± 4.94 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
In [72]: %%timeit
...: xs = [0] * 100
...: xs[0]
...:
416 ns ± 3.79 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/numpyの添え字アクセスは遅い using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.