NISHIO Hirokazu[English][日本語]

Nada School Saturday Class 2025

2025-05-24

image image

I'll just reprint my part.

image - unexplored junior

image

image - broad listening - Not subjective or objective, but from the subjectivity of one to the subjectivity of many.

image

image - Late May 2024, a turbulent time.

image - TTTC: Public Comments on AI and Copyright

image

image - Nittele NEWS x 2024 House of Representatives Election x Broad Listening - Shin Tokyo 2050 Broad Listening

image - Digital Democracy 2030

image - public information AI - Talk to the City and the History of Broadband AI

image - Example of Talk to the City being used by the opposition in the National Assembly to question the Prime Minister. - Constitutional AI Well-Being Conference - The Road to Renewal Broad Listening

image - Broad Listening becomes the standard strategy in one year. image image - Plurality Books

image

image

image

image

image - Democracy is a social technology

question

  • Isn't there a possibility that the AI could skew it when it collects the opinions of many people and puts them together?

    • Of course there is that.
    • But is there no bias if it is put together by a human being? Of course, humans have biases.
    • So this is not an "AI or human" issue.
    • Issues that should be resolved by creating mechanisms such as making the process open and verifiable by a third party
      • Related question: will AI be a black box? - Reasoning model works by verbalizing and outputting the thinking process, and is less of a black box than a person who thinks silently.
        • Research is also underway to examine the internal firing of the model during task execution. This is like sticking electrodes into the brain if you were to use a human analogy.
        • Stabbing electrodes into public officials is ethically difficult, but disclosing the internal state of AI in public service will be possible in the future.
        • If you think being a black box is a problem, you'd rather use AI instead of humans.
  • Not all people can think and speak out about politics, what do we do with those who don't?

  • Influence the international community?

    • Of course, the elimination of language barriers is significant
  • Q: If the generated AI creates a manifesto based on "what opinion will be received by citizens", won't all parties be the same?

    • When they gather in large clusters, differences disappear and supporters are more likely to be in flux, which the existing parties do not like.
    • When you visualize it, there are clusters that are not represented by a political party even at this point in time.
      • Even a small cluster can become a political party with 1%.
      • The assumption that all parties should go to large clusters is incorrect because it is a red ocean to go for a majority.
    • In the long run, it's unclear whether party politics will continue to feel the same way as it does now in the first place.
      • The balance of advantages and disadvantages of the party line is affected by the balance of advantages and disadvantages of the party line.
    • It may not be stable if the support base changes from one place to another.
      • I'm not sure where you're coming from with the assumption that it won't change, that it will change from one thing to another.
  • Nada School Saturday Class


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/灘校土曜講座2025 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.


(C)NISHIO Hirokazu / Converted from Markdown (en)
Source: [GitHub] / [Scrapbox]