Opinion traceability has two directions.

Opinion Traceability has two directions
- Now public information AI has traceability from "final report" to "original post" direction
- It allows you to show that what is written in the report is based on "someone else's" opinion.
- But no traceability in the direction from "original submission" to "final report".
"Is the word traceability appropriate? Consider other expressions.
You raise a good issue. The word "traceability" conveys the meaning, but depending on the nuance, other phrases may be more appropriate. To summarize, it can be summarized as follows.
- traceability
- Originally means "traceability" or "retraceability". It is often used in the manufacturing and food sectors.
- It can be used for one-way tracing of "Report → Submit" without any discomfort.
- However, "Submission → Report" is meant to indicate "where the impact appeared", so "traceability" alone is somewhat weak.
- other candidate expressions
- "Reference Relationships."
Emphasizes that the link is bi-directional. Similar to "cross-referencing" in technical documents.
- Correspondence
Indicate where the submission and the report description correspond. Easy to understand for the general reader.
- Origin Indication" / "Source Indication"
Nuances indicating where the submission was reflected in the report.
- Visualizing Contributions."
From the contributor's point of view, highlight how his/her opinion was reflected. This goes along with the visualization of the contribution.
- Impact Mapping."
Image to map how the original submission affected the final outcome.
- expression of recommendation
relevance
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/意見のトレーサビリティに2方向ある using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.