Supplement to Why Invest in Intellectual Production Techniques?
I made a sticky to write in "[Why invest in intellectual production techniques?
- [Luddite](/en/Luddite) Exercise 1811-1817
- Is it right to increase production?
- Socks are more likely to be mass-produced.
- Increased productivity leads to oversupply.
- If you are productive faster than others, you get paid more than others.
- The same behavior by those around you results in no advantage.
- There is no point in efficiently producing something that does not lead to customer value.
- You can't efficiently produce what your customers don't want.
- Customer value, not quantity
- Understanding cost of customer value
- As the evolution of programming languages increases the efficiency of program production, the relative importance of the ability to determine "what should be made" will increase.
- Productivity gains from programming languages have also increased the productivity of the programming language itself, which is a tool for improving that productivity.
Approach to increase quality and speed by doing the same thing over and over again → exterminated
Questioning assumptions double-loop learning.
The task of questioning assumptions and breaking repetitive loops remains a difficult task to mechanize.
Learn unfamiliar areas
Ability to learn what no one knows the right answer to yet.
Sustained improvement = good?
penetrate
- Sustained Improvement is good in the beginning when customer needs are not yet being met, but as it continues, it will eventually penetrate the Clouds of customer needs and come out on top.
Until now, "what was considered good" has replaced "not good" over time.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/なぜ知的生産術に投資するのか、の補足 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.