attention power

from Diary 2025-05-27 attention power When a person P has 1000 Attention Power and wants 10,000 Ps to listen to him.

• It is impossible to allocate Attention Power 1 to 1,000 people in the first place.
• Allocating 1 Attention Power to 1,000 people is not usually done.
  • The person who is asked is selected according to SOC, such as past relationships, and receives mixed attention: one person receives 100 attentions, another 50, and so on.
  • Receiving 100 Attentions" and "discussing at length" are roughly equivalent.
  • When this "listener" is a politician, it means that many people's voices are not heard.
  • Consider this situation undesirable and improve it.
    • 10000 people discuss at length with the AI, the output of which the AI organizes and makes available for reading in 100 attentions.
    • This composition was in place before AI.
      • 10 assistants each paid 100 attentions to conduct interviews, which were summarized into a readable version with 10 attentions and feedback to P for a total of 100 attentions.
      • It was expensive because it required the use of a large number of smart people.
      • AI is causing price destruction.

2025-06-01

• It used to be the norm to have 0, and we are trying to increase it by improving the system, thinking that it shouldn't be 0, right?
• In this situation, those who insist on "donating 100 by conventional means" are putting their efforts in the opposite direction from the direction of improvement.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/アテンションパワー using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.