NISHIO Hirokazu[English][日本語]

identity politics

o3.icon Identity politics It refers to a position or movement that forms political demands and solidarity based on the "identity group" to which one belongs, such as race/ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, and class. It is characterized by starting from a sense of belonging that "we are a party to ____" rather than conventional ideologies (left/right, labor- capital conflicts, etc.).

historical background

Main Purpose

Criticisms and Issues

  • criticism of universalism
    • There is a danger of fragmenting solidarity by prioritizing partial interests over the "whole of society" (e.g., Francis Fukuyama).
  • essentialist criticism
  • Populism Criticism
    • Emotional victimization may create over-mobilization and weaken rational discussion.
  • backlash

summary While identity politics has the power to put the invisible voices of those involved on the political agenda, it also entails the risk of fragmenting society and deepening conflicts. In practice, the core issue is how to balance the "recognition of difference" and the "construction of the common good.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/アイデンティティポリティクス using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.


(C)NISHIO Hirokazu / Converted from Markdown (en)
Source: [GitHub] / [Scrapbox]