rhetoric
- the birth of sophist and rhetoric
- Historical Background: In ancient Greece (5th century B.C.), in democratic Athens, citizens needed to participate in decision-making through political and legal debate. This led to the development of rhetoric as "the art of persuasion.
- Sophists:.
- Sophists such as Protagoras and Gorgias. taught the art of argumentation and persuasion through the teaching of oratory (rhetoric).
- They pursued arguments with "persuasive power" rather than "truth" and often took a relativistic position (e.g., "Man is the measure of all things").
- plato and rhetorical criticism
- Plato's position:.
- In "Gorgias." and "Pied roe (species of sea lion, Pterois volitans)," Plato criticized rhetoric.
- For him, rhetoric was considered nothing more than "flattery" or "soul-cooking," a technique to manipulate the emotions of an audience and lead them to false conclusions, in contrast to philosophy, which seeks "truth."
- We believed that the true art of persuasion should lie in philosophical argumentation, which rationally arrives at "truth" through dialogue.
- systematization of [Aristotle.
- Formation of "The Art of Speech":.
- Aristotle, unlike Plato, saw rhetoric as a useful and ethically operational skill.
- If the speaker is ethical, that is, if he/she persuades for the public good rather than for private gain, then even "techniques that manipulate the emotions of the audience to lead them to a particular conclusion" would be useful and ethical, although that's not entirely true.
- If the speaker is ethical, that is, if he/she persuades for the public good rather than for private gain, then even "techniques that manipulate the emotions of the audience to lead them to a particular conclusion" would be useful and ethical, although that's not entirely true.
- He defined rhetoric as "the art of speaking about a matter as persuasively as possible within a given context" and positioned it as a complement to logic (logos).
- Three means of persuasion: 1.
- logos - Persuasion by logical argument.
- pathos - The power to arouse emotions in an audience.
- ethos - The character or reliability of the speaker.
- He held that rhetoric was ethically important as part of practical knowledge alongside "dialectic" (dialectic).
- the Roman period: Cicero and Quintilian
- Cicero :
- The Roman orator Cicero saw rhetoric as an indispensable skill in politics and law, which he described as "the art used by good men for good ends."
- In "On Orators," he lists a wide range of knowledge and ethical behavior as qualities of an orator.
- Quintilianus:.
- In his "Oratorical Instruction," he placed rhetoric at the center of his education, aiming to make the "ideal orator" a "morally superior human being."
- medieval to modern: rhetoric in transition
- Middle Ages:.
- In the Christian context, rhetoric was used as a tool in the art of preaching and theological debate.
- Augustine made rhetoric a means of preaching God's truth.
- Renaissance and Modern:.
- During the Renaissance, classical rhetoric experienced a revival and regained importance in politics and literature.
- Although Francis Bacon and Descartes emphasized the establishment of the scientific method and criticized rhetoric as emotional and illogical, there was a reevaluation during the Age of Enlightenment.
- modernity: re-evaluating rhetoric
- Since the 20th century:.
- In philosophy of language, sociology, and rhetorical studies, rhetoric is being reevaluated as more than just a persuasive technique, but as a broader skill involved in human interaction with language and the construction of meaning.
- Kenneth Burke, Scheyon, and others defined rhetoric as the induction of human behavior through the "use of symbols" and analyzed its role in politics and culture.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/レトリック using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.