NISHIO Hirokazu[Translate]
(5.2.6.2) A group that can make a nameplate is a good group
To write a good explanation on the nameplate, you should not classify pieces at the group organization phase. Suppose you think that "this is a cause of the problem, this is also a cause of the problem." What nameplate is attached to this group? Since there is only a relation those are all the cause of the problem, you make a nameplate says "cause of the problem." However, with this nameplate, you do not understand the contents of the group at all.

The reason why you can not make a good explanation is that there was not any relation other than "these are all cause of the problem" in those pieces. To make those pieces into a group is not good.

You can not get the skill of group organization by reading books. You need to try it. After you made a group, you can verify it is a good group or not, by making a nameplate. You can realize the difference between a group that can summarize the contents well and a group that is not so. By doing this exercise, you gradually acquire the skill to organize good groups.
en
"Engineer's way of creating knowledge" the English version of my book is now available on [Engineer's way of creating knowledge]

(C)NISHIO Hirokazu / Converted from [Scrapbox] at [Edit]