Context: thought-node 2025-09-25.
You can't call it a culture difference even if you get along well.
Culture that emphasizes culture fit.
Selection alone is not enough to be a productive community.
Remind them that the opinions of those outside the project are implicitly assumed by those inside.
I think we have a narrow view of each other.
East India Company and personal expenses.
Unified organizational culture lowers transaction costs in the intra-organizational market.
Collaboration and culture fit with people with different perspectives - [There is value in working with people who have Different Perspectives. - There are differences in thinking and focus depending on the differences in what we have seen. - This is beneficial
Is there a trade-off between this and culture fit?
I'm not sure the culture is the same as someone who is interesting to talk to and discuss with.
On the other hand, the culture should be the same with the people you want to work with.
So it is better to get involved in an outsourced way.
The cultures don't have to be the same, but isn't it important to be willing to bounce ideas, opinions, etc. off each other to obtain a fine-tuned integrated whole?
I think we need to be willing to observe first.
I get the sense that Mr. Nishio is acquiring a "human emulator" where he can think about how people who are told such things would feel.
I learned at MOT that there is more than one correctness.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/思考の結節点2025-09-30 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.