PPF represents a trade-off where "producing more of one good forces the production of other goods to decrease," and the amount sacrificed at that time is the opportunity cost. It is one of the basic concepts in economics.
Not necessarily each axis is a good, right? (I believe there was an argument for Goods space or G-space for goods and C-space for features.)
That is correct. In general, PPF is often presented as a diagram with "multiple goods (goods and services)" as axes, but not necessarily only "the goods themselves. For example, in Lancaster's consumer theory, there is a concept called "characteristic space (C-space)" in which the axis is not the goods themselves but the characteristics (features) of the goods. In such cases, the PPF becomes a frontier that represents the maximum possible production of "combinations of characteristics," and each axis represents "which characteristics can be realized and to what extent. In other words, it is possible to think of PPF not only in terms of "goods space (G-space)" but also in terms of "space" from various perspectives.
Trade-off between depth and breadth of cooperation が production possibility frontier だというときの空間はC-spaceです
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/生産可能性フロンティア using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.