Originally, the story was &quot;Only reports of success are reported in the paper, not reports of failure, so there is a bias toward assuming success.
I&#39;ve seen all sorts of things related to this concept.<img src='https://scrapbox.io/api/pages/mitoujr/nishio/icon' alt='/mitoujr/nishio.icon' height="19.5"/>
<ul>
<li>It is easy to talk about in-house products, but difficult to talk about outsourced development.</li>
<li>Only successful people&#39;s tweets get buzzed and communicated to a wide audience.<ul>
<li><blockquote>
<a href="https://twitter.com/nishio/status/1578068284779663360">@nishio</a>: even if the success rate is 0.1%, if 1000 people try it, maybe 1 person will say &quot;I tried this and it worked in one shot!&quot; and it gets a lot of buzz. I tried it 10 times and all succeeded! and then the success rate will finally reach 50%.
</blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The vindictiveness of &quot;I got a PhD but can&#39;t find a job&quot; is easily tweeted, but &quot;I got a job easily, didn&#39;t I?&quot; However, people who think, &quot;I got a job easily, didn&#39;t I?</li>
</ul>
from <a href="https://scrapbox.io/mitoujr/publication-bias">/mitoujr/publication-bias</a>.
<a href="/en/publication%20bias">publication bias</a>
<hr>
This page is auto-translated from <a href="https://scrapbox.io/nishio/%E3%83%91%E3%83%96%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B1%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%83%90%E3%82%A4%E3%82%A2%E3%82%B9">/nishio/パブリケーションバイアス</a> using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at <a href="https://twitter.com/nishio_en">@nishio_en</a>. I&#39;m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.