What does it mean to Understand?While washing dishes, I suddenly thought about the question [What is Understanding?] and quickly jotted down my thoughts.
In response to the question "What is X?"
Level 0 Understanding:
Unable to answer the question at all.
Level 1 Understanding:
Can quote something written in another book or source in response to the question.
Personally, I would like to categorize this as 'not understanding' and place it in Level 0.
However, I refrained from doing so to avoid confusing readers before getting to the main point.
In school exams, if you remember the textbook content and can quote it in response to a time-limited question, you can get good grades.
This has created a social convention that such behavior equates to 'understanding'.
It was only a training method useful when humans had no computers to install knowledge.
It's merely measuring 'installation efficiency'.
If we consider this as 'understanding', then search engines is entities with higher levels of understanding than humans.
→Phenomenology as non-logical steps×dwell-think×本を理解できないときは、引用することしかできない×理解していないことは引用しかできない×非論理的段階としての現象学×体験過程と意味の創造×理解してない時は引用しかできない×住まい-思考×守破離×型×「住まう」とこざね法×シンボル空間×建てること、住むこと、考えること×kozaneba:dwell-think→
→kata×eugene_t._gendlin×martin_heidegger×dwell-think×Phenomenology as non-logical steps×break_the_frame×tradition_is_not_the_worship_of_ashes,_but_the_preservation_of_fire→
→「体験過程と意味の創造」勉強会1×非論理的段階×現象学×Phenomenology as non-logical steps×弁証法×機能的パターン×還元主義×理解は創造×精神現象学×弁証法的現象学×超越論的現象学×解釈学的現象学×シクスツェントミハリ×チクセントミハイ×守破離×ニーチェ×ディオニソス的×デリダ×フェルトセンス→