>When we precisely understand its formed intricacy, that is just when we exceed its forms. When we don't understand a book, we can only quote it. To understand it is to dwell-think in its forms, and that is more precise than the forms.
→understand×what_is_understanding?×when_you_don't_understand,_you_can_only_quote×Phenomenology as non-logical steps×feynman×you_can_test_if_you_understand_the_meaning_of_words_by_explaining_without_using_those_words.×"combustion_is_the_process_of_releasing_a_substance_called_phlogiston"×understanding_is_a_hypothesis×falsifiability×理解の段階→