Resolution Stage
2022/10/8 orthographical variants - Cognitive resolution stage - Cognitive Stages related concept - Cognitive Resolution
2021-10-22 Updated figure.
2019-05-06 First figure.
- [Resolution of perception of things](/en/Resolution%20of%20perception%20of%20things)
- [Wrong 2](/en/Wrong%202) I thought of an example of an over-abstraction of various realities
- [Abstraction is not a good thing.](/en/Abstraction%20is%20not%20a%20good%20thing.) [moderation](/en/moderation)
- I tried to depict the transition between those interpretations.
- 1: The state of assuming that there are only two kinds of things
- The state of thinking that only black and white exist in the world.
- 2: A state in which one realizes that there is also an in-between.
- The state in which I realized that in addition to black and white, there is also gray.
- 3: A state in which one realizes that there are not several kinds of things, but a myriad of kinds.
- A state in which you realize that there is not one kind of gray, but gradations and various kinds of gray.
- 4: A state of realization that the two attributes are not in conflict but can change independently
- What you thought was black and white is independent, like red and blue, and there is purple with both and black without both
- 5: State where you notice that the value is accompanied by a variance
- uncertainty has a variance in the presence of
- One step beyond this is "the state in which one realizes that distribution is not necessarily normally distributed," where "expected value" and "value with the highest probability of occurring" are different.
4 ahead Trade-off between two attributes. Might as well put it in a blind spot card.
2021-10-22
Maybe we can put it in a blind spot card.
After considering it, I felt that this should essentially be broken up into multiple cards.
I guess you dichotomized the lowest resolution state at the resolution stage, but there's even more "identical" --- what you thought was one concept is two nested concepts.
First there is a point, a realization that "It's not a point, it's a size. In a set," which is the base realization of [Proceed in reverse, but the goal is the same.
- Assume it's a point.
- Added 2023-09-08 "It's not a point, it's a size." implicitly assumes "there is a size" = "there is a boundary." but may be [There is no boundary. It's not a point, it's a probability distribution.
- The opposite mistake is the mistake of thinking the distribution is a point.
There is a realization that changes from thinking of a set of that size as "one thing" to "two different things," which is Different things belonging to the same thing.
In the diagram now, there are two followed by three. -
- I skipped over that and realized, "I thought they were two separate things, but they're gradients" False dichotomy.
- I skipped over that and realized, "I thought they were two separate things, but they're gradients" False dichotomy.
The realization that the system may not be a single axis of 4
As for 5.
2022-02-17
Disassembly.
- [Isn't it the size?](/en/Isn't%20it%20the%20size%3F)
- [One? Two?](/en/One%3F%20Two%3F)
- [Are the boundaries clear?](/en/Are%20the%20boundaries%20clear%3F)
- [Isn't there a third one?](/en/Isn't%20there%20a%20third%20one%3F)
- [False dichotomy](/en/False%20dichotomy) : I didn't put the diagram above because there is room for improvement.
- [Aren't there countless of them?](/en/Aren't%20there%20countless%20of%20them%3F)
- [Isn't there more than one axis?](/en/Isn't%20there%20more%20than%20one%20axis%3F)
- > 4 not a single axis, but the realization that the system is not a single axis.
- > [False dichotomy](/en/False%20dichotomy)
- > [The axis is not one-dimensional.](/en/The%20axis%20is%20not%20one-dimensional.)
- > [There is more than one strong and weak axis](/en/There%20is%20more%20than%20one%20strong%20and%20weak%20axis)
- > [Large and small relationships do not exist.](/en/Large%20and%20small%20relationships%20do%20not%20exist.)
- [Trade-off between two attributes](/en/Trade-off%20between%20two%20attributes) too.
5: State in which you notice that the value is accompanied by a variance
uncertainty with the state where the value has variance
One step beyond this is "the state where you realize that distribution is not necessarily normally distributed", where the "expected value" and the "value with the highest probability of occurring" are different.
- [Isn't there a variance?
- Isn't Expected value is not the mode. like a blind spot because it's often said?
- Should we adopt it because so many people are addicted to it, as they often say?
- I find it surprising to hear that the comparison of averages is not in full order Efron's Dice.
- The other two are, well, blind spots.
- Sometimes the greater the variation, the better."
- If you listen to a lot of people's opinions and take an average when the greater the variation the better, it's going to be worse.
- The two are connected in terms of
- Fundamentally nonlinear threshold function effects
- So probability resonance also leads
2022/11/24
- I'll chew on 5 a little more.
- Isn't there a variance?
- I thought the variances would be different.
- I thought the distribution shapes were different.
- Recognition of distribution shapes
- Note the shape of the distribution, not just the mean.
- Point, dispersion and distribution shape
- be divided into
It was once titled "Resolution of Reality" phase (2019-05-06)
- I tried to link this page on 2021-03-28 and mistook it for "stages of cognitive resolution" Cognitive Resolution.
- After thinking about the swing of Resolution of Reality and Cognition, I felt that Resolution of perception of things would be better.
- I used "stages of resolution" because "stages of resolution of perception of things" is too long.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/解像度の段階 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.