NISHIO Hirokazu[English][日本語]

Retroactive Public Goods Funding

o3.icon [Vitalik Buterin](/en/Vitalik%20Buterin) advocates "Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RPGF)" as a new method of public goods funding that "creates value first, and rewards it later. The key insight is that "it is easier to look back and build consensus on what has already worked than to predict future usefulness. This mechanism has been implemented in the Optimism Collective and others, and billions of yen in funds have actually been allocated.
  1. conception and basic principles
  • 1-1. "After the fact" is easier to agree upon
    • Conventional grants are reviewed on a "should be useful in the future" planning basis, which carries a high risk of information asymmetry and overestimation.
    • RPGF is reviewed and rewarded after results are achieved, so actual impact can be used as a measure and agreement is easier to reach.

1-2. minimum configuration of the mechanism

  • Fund Pool: accumulates foundation and protocol profits, donations, etc.
  • Results Submission: Developers, researchers, etc. declare "past contributions".
  • Impact evaluation: Badge holders (judges) weight the evaluation by voting, QFs, etc.
  • Token/Cash Allocation: Rewards are allocated on a weighted basis. Vitalik describes this as "simply setting up a well-funded oracle a judging body can create a public goods market."
  • Vitalik Buterin & Karl Floersch: Retroactive Public Goods Funding

Vitalik recommends a hybrid of "layered QF and RPGF, seeding first with QF and then heavily rewarding with RPGF as results are achieved."

  1. current issues and challenges
  • Scalability of evaluation: 500+ cases were reviewed in Round 3, but man-hours spiked.
  • Quantification of Impact: The results of open source contributions, education, basic research, etc. are diverse, and uniform evaluation is difficult.
  • Popularity Risk: The risk that large allocations will be skewed toward projects with high visibility.
  • Sustainable funding sources: Optimism is funded by fee revenue, but financial resource design is a challenge for other chain communities.

summary Retroactive Public Goods Funding is Vitalik's proposal to streamline public goods support by "distributing funds after seeing results" and is being implemented on a large scale in RetroPGF in Optimism. Expansion of the evaluation regime and standardization of indicators are the next challenges, but in combination with QF and other incentive designs, it is becoming the key to raising the bar for public goods sustainability in the entire Web3 ecosystem.

Retroactive Public Goods Funding. Note: The Optimism team has long been… | by Optimism | Optimism PBC Blog | Medium

Review of Optimism retro funding round 1

Retroactive public goods funding

/tkgshn/how-to-sustainably-manage-digital-public-goods. Retroactive Public Goods Funding giving Exit to /tkgshn/public-goods(OSS). [/tkgshn/ It is easier to agree on what has helped than on what has not](https://scrapbox.io/tkgshn/ It is easier to agree on what has helped than on what has not).


This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/Retroactive Public Goods Funding](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/Retroactive Public Goods Funding) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.


(C)NISHIO Hirokazu / Converted from Markdown (en)
Source: [GitHub] / [Scrapbox]