>LLMの話とPluralityの話がつながってるという僕の認識があんまり共有されてないなぁと思ったのでもう少し言語化を試みると

>まず僕はPluralityに出会う以前からLLMによって組織というもののあり方には大きな影響があると考えていた: LLMがもたらす組織構造の変化

> これは「ティール組織」で、技術的環境の変化がどのように組織構造に変化を与えてきたか語られていたのの延長線上にある。

> でもってここに僕が書いていた考えが、Pluralityの文脈ではブロードリスニングという名前が付いて、PolisやvTaiwanなどの形で現実に使われつつある

>nishio_en I drew this for my colleges. They didn't understand the possible combination of Broad Listening(such as Polis) and Large Language Model(such as GPT) in future.

>

>nishio_en If I understand correctly, there are at least three technologies heading toward Plurality.

> X: Broad Listening (or visualization of opinion distribution among diversity)

> Y: Quadratic Funding (it is an implementation of redistribution of resources among diversity)

> Z: Large Language Model (it makes communication among diversity efficient)

>

>nishio_en Some might wonder why not mention of Decentralized Identity? DID is important component of both Broad Listening and Quadratic Funding. I just avoided to draw four-dimensional cube. That is why I used the words "at least three".

>nishio_en One more thing. I wrote "Quadratic Funding" but I feel it too specific. I don't know comprehensive term for the mechanisms such as Quadratic Funding, Retroactive Funding and Social Impact Bond.